








3.0| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
1 1 |
2 2 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
1 1 |
7 1 |
2.6 5 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
7 1 |
| Total: Votes: |
1 1 |
1.7 3 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
1 1 |
7 1 |
3 7 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
This film with Jody Foster I found was okay but needed improvement in the acting itself. She was good in her roles though. Found it boring but then got into the story but all the other ones like Notting Hill, Dead Man Walking, had given good acting while watching. They were very involving and you wanted always to find out what will happen near the end which brought alot of tension to these ones.
| 7/10 | andreaquebec0@ - 17 reviews 27.10.2009 |
It is the worst and stupidest movie I have ever seen. Please dont see it!
| 1/10 | jordan.kenneth@ - 4 reviews 17.2.2009 - age: 1-12 |
I hated this movie so dumb. Also lame and there was no plot at all! Very predictable and you would be disappointed.
| 3/10 | stillerfan@ - 18 reviews 18.4.2008 - age: 13-17 |
It was the worst experience of my life. There's no story, no suspense and no action at all. Very dumb.
| 1/10 | v_lecavalier@ - 2 reviews 12.4.2008 - age: 36-49 |
Very bad. I couldn't see what was going on. This movie is dumb and I really hope to have rated it lower than 1. Maybe negative 5.
| 1/10 | grilledcheese123@ - 22 reviews 3.4.2008 - age: 13-17 |
Well, it just didnt get interesting at any time.
| 1/10 | charmander_97@ - first review 27.1.2008 - age: 13-17 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.