CinemaClock   
Kelowna    
  Français 
Home Top 10 Playing Upcoming Trailers A to Z Theatres DVD

The Lord Of The Rings
 
windowtop
windowtop
15 user reviews

7.6/10

Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age:   1-12    13-17   18-25   26-35   36-49    50+    Total  
Men:
Votes:
-
0
8
3
-
0
9
1
4
1
-
0
7.4
5
Women:
Votes:
10
2
5.3
3
9
1
-
0
10
1
9
1
8
8
Total:
Votes:
10
2
6.7
6
9
1
9
1
7
2
9
1
7.6
15
Total includes also voters who didn't specify their sex.

windowtop
windowtop

Click here to write your review and to vote!
Filter reviews
windowtop
windowtop
Showing all 15 reviews...

Not that good the worst lord of the rings ever.
5/10
8.1.2007 - shannon-a_k_a-midget@ - age: 13-17
63 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Well, I mean this one ain't even half as good as the Peter Jackson movies, but since it was a lord of the rings movie lets still respect it I mean this one followed the books more but the fact that it was cartoon was badly thought out, I didn't really get into this one, but I'll rate it 6.
6/10
10.5.2005 - bizzy_d_2005@ - age: 13-17
17 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This is the awesomest movie even tho PJ's is better. It's really good for animation!!!
10/10
11.7.2004 - the_one_ring16@ - age: 1-12
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I thought that this was a very well-done movie until they started over-using the smudgy black animation that they used for the orcs. I also thought that they rushed through the events of The Two Towers too quickly, and didn't explain enough.
7/10
23.2.2004 - kayleigh-ann@
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I really liked this movie. After I watched it I was totally excited to know what would happen next. This movie made me being interested in the triology. Great movie.
9/10
22.2.2004 - icefire19@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Stick with PJ's version.
6/10
21.1.2004 - bigmike1989@
66 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I believe that all you people who are giving it good ratings must be thinking of the new Peter Jackson ones, because this one (for lack of a better word) sucked. It scarred me for life, and it made me avoid the books for the longest time. I thought it was just stupid and didn't understand why anyone could like it. Then I went to see FOTR five years later. It changed my mind completely. But if this movie hadn't been so damn awful in the first place, I would have probably read the books, and known about LOTR alot sooner than I did. And that is something that should not be delayed.
1/10
15.1.2004 - miroki_15@ - age: 13-17
7 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
A great movie! The special effect was amazing. I really enjoyed it.
10/10
28.12.2003 - rmutiger77@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I really enjoyed this movie. For the time it was made the special effects were amazing. I had been concerned that animation (I did not want a great book to be a cartoon) could not do the book justice but this one did. Very well done!
9/10
18.10.2003 - katydidit_4@ - age: 50+
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
This movie was no fun at all. I saw it when I was a kid, and had a hard time following the story. Character development was totally absent. It convinced me this great book could not be made into a film. I was wrong.
4/10
16.6.2003 - dominicproctor@ - age: 36-49
315 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply